Techno-economic and environmental optimisation of photovoltaic systems based on self-consumption with surplus grid injection for industrial buildings
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluates the technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of a rooftop photovoltaic system for an industrial facility consuming 67184 kWh/year. The system is optimised for self-consumption, with surplus exported to the grid. Modelling and PVsyst simulations considered the load profile, rooftop geometry and corrected solar irradiation. Four photovoltaic capacities (30, 40, 50, and 60 kWp) were analysed. A multi-criteria approach was applied to assess their performance across technical, economic, and environmental pillars. The 30 kWp system is undersised while the 60 kWp system produces excessive surplus. Compared to the 40 kWp system, the 50 kWp configuration generates 26 % more energy, 23.8 % more surplus, and requires 15 % higher capital expenditure. The 40 kWp system delivers 49807 kWh/year, of which 25702 kWh are self-consumed, with an 8-year payback. CO2 emissions avoided reah 285.6 t over 25 years, with a 8-year carbon payback. The multi-criteria analysis identifies the 40 kWp system as the optimal solution.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Al Shumrani MA, Gulistan M, Abbas T. (2026) Multi-criteria decision making approach for solar energy implementation using N-cubic fuzzy interaction aggregation operators. Scientific Reports, 16, 1138. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-30869-7.
Basaran K, Özdemir MT, Bayrak G. (2025). Sizing and techno-economic analysis of utility-scale PV systems with energy storage systems in factory buildings: An application study. Applied Sciences, 15(7), 3876. Doi: 10.3390/app15073876.
Belhaouas N, Hafdaoui H, Mehareb F. (2025). Analysis of the relationship between photovoltaic temperature coefficients and varying solar irradiance levels. Journal of Renewable Energies, SIEER'2025 (Special Issue), 28(5), 103–111. Doi: 10.54966/jreen.v28i5.1548.
Bouroumeid Y, Jbilou M, Bechekir SE, Arezki M, Ghaitaoui EA, Oulad Naou BEK, Taghezouit B, Assem H, Madjoudj N, Chahtou A, Saheb-Koussa D. (2024). Analysis of the efficiency of a solar photovoltaic power plant linked to the electrical grid. Journal of Renewable Energies, IREnDAYS’24 (Special issue), 67–73. Doi: 10.54966/jreen.v1i1.1236.
Camilo FM, Castro R, Almeida ME, Fernao Pires V. (2017). Economic assessment of residential PV systems with self-consumption and storage in Portugal. Solar Energy, 150, 353–362. Doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.062.
Chen Jong F., Mohamud Ahmed M. (2024). Multi criteria decision making solutions for optimal solar energy sites identification: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 12, 143458-143484, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3461948.
Ciocia, A., Amato, A., Di Leo, P., Fichera, S., Malgaroli, G., Spertino, F., & Tzanova, S. (2021). Self-consumption and self-sufficiency in photovoltaic systems: Effect of grid limitation and storage installation. Energies, 14(6), 1591. Doi: 10.3390/en14061591.
García JL, Perdigones A, Benavente RM, Álvarez J, Baptista F, Mazarrón FR. (2023). Feasibility of photovoltaic systems for the agrifood industry in the new energy and climate change context. Agronomy, 13(10), 2620. Doi : 10.3390/agronomy13102620.
Hazem T, Cheghib H, Fezzani A, et al. (2025). Performance evaluation of grid connected photovoltaic pilot plant in Saharan climate using experimental and numerical analysis. Scientific Reports, 15, 32488. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-19300-3.
Hu X, Hu J, Zhang H. (2020). A life-cycle cost-benefit analysis for rooftop photovoltaic systems in lightweight steel-structured industrial buildings. Environmental Science & Sustainable Development, 5(2), 20–31. Doi: 10.21625/essd.v5i2.757.
Jäger Waldau A. (2025). Snapshot of photovoltaics. EPJ Photovoltaics, 16, 22. Doi: 10.1051/epjpv/2025012.
Kalogirou S A. (2017). McEvoy's handbook of photovoltaics: Fundamentals and applications. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier.
Laksono DT, Laksono DT, Fahmi MF, Afrianti R, Dodi N. (2025). Technical performance analysis of a 1 MWp grid-connected photovoltaic system in Pangkalan Kerinci, Indonesia using PVsyst simulation. International Journal of Science, Engineering, and Information Technology, 10(01). https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/ijseit/article/download/32479/pdf.
Mohand Kaci G, Mahrane A, Ghedamsi K, Chikh M. (2024). Techno-economic feasibility analysis of grid-connected residential PV systems in Algeria. Energy & Environment, 35(4), 1936–1966. Doi : 10.1177/0958305X221146953.
Neumüller, A., Geier, S., & Österreicher, D. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment for Photovoltaic Structures- Comparative Study of Rooftop and Free-Field PV Applications. Sustainability, 15, 13692. Doi: 10.3390/su151813692.
Pedrero J, Hernandez P, Martinez A. (2021). Economic evaluation of PV installations for self-consumption in industrial parks. Energies, 14(3), 728. Doi: 10.3390/en14030728.
Rouabhia A, Dabou R, Abderrahmane A, Ziane A, Bouraiou A, Khelifi S, Sahouane N, Necaibia A, Blal M. (2025). Low-cost real-time monitoring for enhanced efficiency in PV systems. Journal of Renewable Energies, 28(1), 81–92. Doi: 10.54966/jreen.v28i1.1348.
Rus, T., Moldovan, R.-P., & Pardo Picazo, M. A. (2024). LCA analysis of a roof-mounted PV system: A Romanian case study. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1413629. Doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1413629.
Sanchez-Jiménez JL, Jiménez-Castillo G, Rus-Casas C, Martinez-Calahorro AJ, Munoz-Rodriguez FJ. (2025). Performance evaluation of photovoltaic self-consumption systems on industrial rooftops under continental Mediterranean climate conditions with multi-string inverter topology. Energy Reports, 14, 1020–1042. Doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2025.06.047.
Yildirim B, Düzkaya H. (2025). Comparative analysis with PVGIS and PVsyst for solar energy production in Bahsili region of Kirikkale. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarim ve Teknoloji, 13(3), 877–891. Doi : 10.29109/gujsc.1661431.
Zaghba L, Khennane Benbitour M, Fezzani A, Mekhilef S, Borni A. (2025). Comprehensive performance assessment of two grid-tied photovoltaic systems in a hot arid climate: A three-year theoretical and experimental analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 216, 115643. Doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115643.
Web sites
Google LLC. Google Earth Pro (Version 7.3), https://earth.google.com/; [accessed 29 April 2025].
IEA. (2025). Global energy review 2025. Source: IEA, International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org; 2025 [accessed 03 January 2026].
MeteoGalicia. Meteorological and climate data portal, https://www.meteogalicia.gal; [accessed 29 April 2025].
PVGIS - Photovoltaic Geographical Information System, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/pvgis; [accessed 13 April 2025].
SunCalc - Sun position calculator, https://suncalc.org; [accessed 29 April 2025].